Read this disclaimer first!!
Monday, Apr. 21, 2003 - 2:51 p.m.
ComPOOters

I got back from Brockapulco yesterday only to find that one computer has a fucked up power supply, and the other has a fucked up OS. I get to work today and guess what? I have a fucking virus. Nice, eh?

0 scrawls at the end of this hall

The look: annoyed
The feel: joyful
The taste: camembert
________________________
Monday, Apr. 21, 2003 - 1:28 p.m.
Proof, please

As much as I want to believe that nothing comes of war except atrocities, I have to wonder where people get their information.

For instance, this article mentions all kinds of things that have happened in the last month or so. Here's an example:

The following story was first published on April 3, during the war. Since then, the Baseball Hall of Fame cancelled the 15th-anniversary celebration of the movie 'Bull Durham' due to antiwar comments by actor Tim Robbins; and many Pakistani-Americans have had their credit card accounts cancelled by American Express with no explanation.

Is this true? Is any of this true? You'd think this would have made bigger headlines, wouldn't you?

It's not a bad article (although I think the write is a bit of a dick in his own personal anecdotes), but I wonder at what point does an editorial or opinion piece need to provide some references for its claims. He sounds as trustworthy as those embedded journalists.

By the way, a note to those Americans who are boycotting Canadian products: you might want to stop driving, since much of your oil comes from us.

**********************************

If there were a word such as "american" (not "American"), what would it mean? Publicly arrogant and bossy? Short-sighted? You could say something like "Oh, that's very american of you." Hmmm, I'll ask the pundits.

0 scrawls at the end of this hall

The look: full
The feel: listless
The taste: chocolatey
________________________